0.00/0.09	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_4593 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.09/0.10	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.09/0.29	% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
0.09/0.29	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.29	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.29	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.29	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.29	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.09/0.29	% WCLimit    : 180
0.09/0.29	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 12:42:59 EDT 2023
0.09/0.29	% CPUTime    : 
0.14/0.39	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oSAYZtHYls/Vampire---4.8_4593
0.14/0.39	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.14/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.14/0.40	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# post_as_ho12 with pid 4802 completed with status 0
0.14/0.40	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.14/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.14/0.40	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# No SInE strategy applied
0.14/0.40	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSS32-MSSFFSBN
0.14/0.40	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.14/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 109s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# post_as_ho12 with pid 4810 completed with status 0
0.14/0.40	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.14/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.14/0.40	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# No SInE strategy applied
0.14/0.40	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSS32-MSSFFSBN
0.14/0.40	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.14/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 109s (1) cores
0.14/0.40	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.14/0.40	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.14/0.40	
0.14/0.40	# Proof found!
0.14/0.40	# SZS status Theorem
0.14/0.40	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.14/0.40	thf(decl_22, type, cHALF: $i > $i > $o).
0.14/0.40	thf(decl_23, type, cDOUBLE: $i > $i > $o).
0.14/0.40	thf(decl_24, type, cS: $i > $i).
0.14/0.40	thf(decl_25, type, c0: $i).
0.14/0.40	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_3: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $i).
0.14/0.40	thf(decl_27, type, esk2_3: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $i).
0.14/0.40	thf(decl_28, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.14/0.40	thf(decl_29, type, esk4_0: $i).
0.14/0.40	thf(cTHM301, conjecture, ((((![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cHALF @ X1 @ X2)=>(cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X1)) @ (cS @ X2))))&(cHALF @ (cS @ c0) @ c0))&(cHALF @ c0 @ c0))&![X3:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i, X5:$i]:(((X3 @ X4 @ X5)<=((![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((X3 @ (cS @ X1) @ (cS @ (cS @ X2)))<=(X3 @ X1 @ X2)))&(X3 @ c0 @ c0))&(cDOUBLE @ X4 @ X5)))))=>![X4:$i, X5:$i]:(((cDOUBLE @ X4 @ X5)=>(cHALF @ X5 @ X4)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oSAYZtHYls/Vampire---4.8_4593', cTHM301)).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(((((![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cHALF @ X1 @ X2)=>(cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X1)) @ (cS @ X2))))&(cHALF @ (cS @ c0) @ c0))&(cHALF @ c0 @ c0))&![X3:$i > $i > $o, X4:$i, X5:$i]:((((![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((X3 @ X1 @ X2)=>(X3 @ (cS @ X1) @ (cS @ (cS @ X2)))))&(X3 @ c0 @ c0))&(cDOUBLE @ X4 @ X5))=>(X3 @ X4 @ X5))))=>![X4:$i, X5:$i]:(((cDOUBLE @ X4 @ X5)=>(cHALF @ X5 @ X4))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM301])])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X15:$i, X16:$i, X17:$i > $i > $o, X18:$i, X19:$i]:((((((~(cHALF @ X15 @ X16)|(cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X15)) @ (cS @ X16)))&(cHALF @ (cS @ c0) @ c0))&(cHALF @ c0 @ c0))&(((X17 @ (esk1_3 @ X17 @ X18 @ X19) @ (esk2_3 @ X17 @ X18 @ X19))|~(X17 @ c0 @ c0)|~(cDOUBLE @ X18 @ X19)|(X17 @ X18 @ X19))&(~(X17 @ (cS @ (esk1_3 @ X17 @ X18 @ X19)) @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk2_3 @ X17 @ X18 @ X19))))|~(X17 @ c0 @ c0)|~(cDOUBLE @ X18 @ X19)|(X17 @ X18 @ X19))))&((cDOUBLE @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)&~(cHALF @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X3 @ X1 @ X2)|~((X3 @ (cS @ (esk1_3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2)) @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk2_3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2)))))|~((X3 @ c0 @ c0))|~((cDOUBLE @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (cDOUBLE @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X3 @ (esk1_3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2) @ (esk2_3 @ X3 @ X1 @ X2))|(X3 @ X1 @ X2)|~((X3 @ c0 @ c0))|~((cDOUBLE @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i > $i > $o]:(((X3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)|~((X3 @ (cS @ (esk1_3 @ X3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)) @ (cS @ (cS @ (esk2_3 @ X3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)))))|~((X3 @ c0 @ c0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cHALF @ (cS @ (cS @ X1)) @ (cS @ X2))|~((cHALF @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (cHALF @ c0 @ c0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~((cHALF @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i > $i > $o]:(((X3 @ (esk1_3 @ X3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ (esk2_3 @ X3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0))|(X3 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)|~((X3 @ c0 @ c0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_4])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~((cHALF @ (esk2_3 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((cHALF @ Z1 @ Z0))) @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ (esk1_3 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((cHALF @ Z1 @ Z0))) @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7]), c_0_8])]), c_0_9])).
0.14/0.40	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_8]), c_0_11]), c_0_9]), ['proof']).
0.14/0.40	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.14/0.40	# Parsed axioms                        : 5
0.14/0.40	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.14/0.40	# Initial clauses                      : 11
0.14/0.40	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
0.14/0.40	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
0.14/0.40	# Processed clauses                    : 18
0.14/0.40	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.14/0.40	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.14/0.40	# ...remaining for further processing  : 18
0.14/0.40	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.14/0.40	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.14/0.40	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.14/0.40	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.14/0.40	# Generated clauses                    : 16
0.14/0.40	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
0.14/0.40	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.14/0.40	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.14/0.40	# Paramodulations                      : 8
0.14/0.40	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.14/0.40	# NegExts                              : 0
0.14/0.40	# Equation resolutions                 : 2
0.14/0.40	# Total rewrite steps                  : 2
0.14/0.40	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.14/0.40	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.14/0.40	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.14/0.40	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.14/0.40	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.14/0.40	# Current number of processed clauses  : 11
0.14/0.40	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
0.14/0.40	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.14/0.40	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.14/0.40	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 6
0.14/0.40	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
0.14/0.40	# ...number of literals in the above   : 8
0.14/0.40	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.14/0.40	# Current number of archived clauses   : 7
0.14/0.40	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
0.14/0.40	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.14/0.40	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.14/0.40	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.14/0.40	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.14/0.40	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.14/0.40	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.14/0.40	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.14/0.40	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.14/0.40	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 2499
0.14/0.40	
0.14/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.40	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.14/0.40	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.14/0.40	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.14/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
0.14/0.40	
0.14/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.40	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.14/0.40	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.14/0.40	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.14/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
0.14/0.40	% E---3.1 exiting
0.14/0.40	EOF